Teenage
Sexuality
Speaker:
Dr. Felicia Hance-Stewart (click
here for biography)
Soap
Summit 2
Transcript
of Proceedings
September 7, 1996
DR. FELICIA
HANCE STEWART: Thank you. I had the opportunity last year to participate
in the Talk Show Summit with my government hat on and it turned out to
be one of the more interesting and exciting days. So it's a real pleasure
for me to be here today, and I especially appreciate as Sonny mentioned
last night, just the fact that all of you are here illustrates one of
the little-known realities about just what an important commitment the
media really has to a constructive role in our lives and the lives of
our kids.
My job today is to introduce Dr. Heintz-Knowles who is the researcher.
But before that I get to take advantage of those couple of minutes, first
of all, to share with you the statistical information that the press will
be getting at noon, so you'll all have it. To explain a little bit about
what Kaiser's commitment in this are and the rationale for it. I get to
share with you one story plot idea. [LAUGHTER] Because I know that probably
everybody in America has story plot ideas, and the fact that I have the
microphone right now gives me the [LAUGHS].
But it's
a story plot idea that also gives some sense of what a difference the
works that you all do makes, and to make an offer from the Kaiser Family
Foundation to be of more help. Before I start, first of all I would like
very much to acknowledge the incredible work that Sonny Fox has done in
not only getting this particular workshop together but in making this
whole area happen in the United States and I think get us a long way down
the road towards applying for our own people some of the lessons, frankly,
that are better understood in other parts of the world. So I first of
all would like to thank him and congratulate him both on his wisdom, his
strength, and tenacity in getting this together. [APPLAUSE] I would also
like to acknowledge two people, Suzanne Delbanco and Tina Hoff, who are
standing, sitting over here. They actually were responsible in very substantial
part for the design and the ideas that went into making this whole survey
process as meaningful and substantive as it is. Kaiser Family Foundation
has had a long time interest in the issue of media and their role in providing
public health information about reproductive health issues. The fact is
that you are the people that actually talk to the people that we would
like most to be able to communicate with. And not just a few at a time.
You know,
after 25 years in clinical practice myself, talking one at a time to women,
there's no question that there's nothing more wonderful and fun than that.
But it is not the same impact. And in fact I think, generally speaking,
despite my hard work for those 25 years, we may have been slipping a little
behind on some of these issues. [LAUGHS] Clearly, we have to find ways
to make this part of a much bigger undertaking. And that bigger undertaking
of talking to 40 million people who are exactly the kind of people who
most need accurate information every single day, is what not only are
you good at, but you're way better than any of us in public health ever
has been or probably ever will be. So we really need to have the help
of your incredible expertise on how to communicate effectively how to
get people's attention, how to make things interesting and how to get
some factual information in there that's as constructive as possible for
them.
Now, in terms
of the research studies that we're going to be talking about today, as
Sonny explained, this project involved monitoring---, and you're going
to hear a great more depth about this from the research herself, monitoring
the content and comparing it essentially to the findings that we had two
years ago that you all had the opportunity to see in 1994. The study,
however, had a little more depth and context than the previous study did
in the sense that we didn't just count up little sexual behaviorettes.
You know, a hug, a kiss, a glance, a meaningful word. This time there
was an opportunity to put a context around each of those little vignettes
to determine whether there was or was not planning ahead or sense of what
consequences people might need to consider in relationship to what was
going on. And that actually brings us, I think, some of the most powerful
and heart-warming information about major change and major constructive
role that all the work that all of you do, can have. So, as you can see
from this little chart, there, one of the fundamental messages is that
overall the total number and behaviors here are each little teeny piece.
So, the top, it doesn't mean that there was six acts of intercourse on
ever hour of soap programming. But the overall focus on sexual issues
is about the same.
Overall,
the total amount of emphasis on sexual issues really did not change significantly.
One thing that did change, very interesting and I do not know whether
this is generally true of other issues that you may be covering in the
storylines, but there's less talk and more to see. So the shift was from
predominately two-thirds talking about sexual issues in 1994 to now, two
years later, more visual representation. Now I suspect that is meaningful
because generally speaking visual things are imprinting and kind of having
a meeting in a different way than talking does. But it's an interesting
observation. Now what about consequences? One area where we are particularly
interested in trying to do this in a good way is to have the issue of
decision-making about sexuality and sexual activity and reproductive health
issues generally connected to someway of counting or counting for consequences.
And we did see in 58 little vignettes some accounting for consequences
as part of the story-line.
But the vast
majority of the time, 90% of the time, that isn't part of the story-line
now. So that's an area where maybe some creativity and possible improvement
can happen. Similarly, looking at the bottom here, condoms now actually
seem to be safe to show on TV. And, in fact, there were five glimpses
of condoms in the little intervals that we studied. Most of them connected,
though, with two specific story-line plots. So it wasn't something now
we're seeing this commonly interwoven with other stories. Similarly, out
of the 17 actual intercourse acts that were depicted, there was condom
in only one. So we're still kind of a long ways from the proportion of
showing some kind of contraceptive and STD prevention actually there in
connection with intercourse than maybe we'd ideally like to be. But one
of the things that was the most heartening, and this is the top one, the
little baby carriages here, that despite the fact that the actual use
of a method was not very common, woven into the story-line plots and in,
or into the vignettes, in almost half the cases, was at least something
about consequences.
The planning
ahead for or anticipating and considering possible consequences. Now that,
we don't really have a direct comparison because we know the study two
years ago didn't include as much contacts. So we weren't able to make
a direct comparison. But in my opinion, that is certainly an extremely
positive, and frankly amazing finding in terms of what possible constructive
role these stories might have for real people. Now we're going to go through
in much more detail, the results of the rest of the study and Dr. Heintz-Knowles
will explain in depth and there were lots of other very interesting findings
that she'll have a chance to talk to you about. But I would like to share
with you one little glimpse of how we can tell that what you're doing
matters so much. And this has to do with my story-line, plot idea. So,
please take notes. [LAUGHTER]
Now I want
you to kind of mentally close your eyes and picture yourself back to the
time in your own lives, and maybe some of you are still there, the time,
as my kids put it, when you had a life. [LAUGHS] And it is now like 1:30
in the morning on a Saturday night or a Sunday night and you really had
a wonderful evening the night before. It was a meaningful relationship.
You really cared about this other person you're with. You had a wonderful
night. More passionate and intense experience that you normally would
have. But there you are lying in bed and you're thinking about the fact
that a condom broke maybe or you really had meant to kind of get re-started
on your pills but you hadn't quite gotten around to going to the doctor
and so you actually probably should have started again on Friday but,
you know, you were kind of thinking well maybe I'll be all right. And
you're lying there on Sunday morning thinking, "You know, that really
was not such a good idea. This would not be the time that I would like
to be pregnant" Or maybe, a really good friend calls because she
was raped the night before and she is okay, you know, not hurt. But going
through that awful mental checklist, not only woundedness but fear that
she's going to be facing around the issues of maybe STD exposure or pregnancy.
Now if you were there lying in the bed thinking at 1:30 in the morning,
"oh my goodness, this was not a good idea, what you could do for
your friend, what would your concerns be and what would you do the next
day? One of the concerns, of course, would be pregnancy and the issue
of wouldn't it be wonderful if there was something I could do now that
would reduce that risk?"
And the fact
of the matter is there is something that can be done now to reduce that
risk and it's a very simple, low-tech thing that we have had for 20 years
and if indeed you went to the Student Health Service at a college or you
went to the emergency room to be treated after a rape, you would almost
for sure be offered emergency contraceptive pills to take the morning
after that could reduce the risk of pregnancy by 75%. Now how many of
you in this room know about emergency contraceptive pills? Fabulous.
I can tell
you that five years ago if I had asked that question in this room there
wouldn't have been anybody. And as I've been speaking around the country
over the last years, we've gradually seen an increasing knowledge. But
very few people, percentage-wise are aware of this option. And it is a
simple option. It is available right today. There's not a reason in the
world that anyone in that situation shouldn't have some way to make a
connection with emergency contraceptives. So finding some way, I suggest
this story-line plot because I really do understand that public health
messages, you cannot intrude on your entertainment value story-lines and
plots if it's boring. You know, you cannot trade for the boring and banal.
But this would be a really juicy little plot line that I think would be
really a great one for young people. Now, and we have, furthermore, some
evidence of what a difference it makes. This does not relate to the soaps
because we don't--, we haven't had any 800 number follow-up for soaps.
But we have had an 800 number for emergency contraception and it was covered
on MTV.
Now this
little graph is the number of phone calls to the national hotline for
emergency contraception in the month of April 1996. Normally, it's been
running about 130 a day. MTV ran a less than one minute news clip in their
little news clip in the middle of April for two days. The calls to the
emergency hotline, which includes information about emergency contraception
and also provides referral numbers for three doctors or nurse practitioners
nearest the caller's area code for referrals where they can actually get
it. The calls jumped from 130 a day to 3,000, the two segment days that
that ad was run. Now I like to think that at least for some of those people,
finding somebody to get emergency contraception actually helped them in
their actual real life, right then that day. I'm sure there were some
people calling out of curiosity. But if you doubt for a minute that the
people who are watching your shows actually listen and hear the medical
stuff and relate it to their own lives, this is proof positive that that
is not the case and that actually people believe everything you say and
think that you are an extremely important and accurate source of information.
Now that leads me to the offer I want to make. You can call us any time
if you need help gathering background information similar to the kind
of help that Dr. Shalala was offering. If you want me to go running around
and try to find out what's the best info on warts or something like that,
I will do that very gladly. And we certainly understand your need for
quick turnaround time. And we have pretty good connections with most of
the other major organizations so that it's a feasible thing that we can
do. So you can call me anytime, day or night and I will be glad to find
out about whatever miscellaneous medical aggravation in the area of reproductive
health that you think might be helpful to your work.
So if you're
a scriptwriter and you're wondering what to say about wart virus, you
just call me up and I'll be glad to send you stuff, or find out who knows
if I don't. The second thing that we'd be very interesting in doing and
offering as a resource, we have had jointly sponsored 800 numbers and
jointly, joint kind of collaborative ventures with various different media
organizations, including the Washington Post. And we're working
with various different mainline resources. And one of the things that
we imagine might be attractive to you is to have the ability to set up
a temporary 800 number. So if you're going to cover something that's a
hot topic that you want to be able to give your viewers someplace to go,
a little more depth of resources, we would be very glad to jointly organize
the materials and appropriate information and get that hotline up and
running and underway and funded to run for the period of time that you
need it as a back-up on your particular story-line. So if that seems like
something that would be helpful, I would certainly love to hear from any
one of you and we'll be glad to try to figure out a way to make these
things work. Now with that all said and done, it's my wonderful pleasure
to introduce the woman who actually watched all your stuff with such great
care and did the calculations and analysis that is the basis of this research.
Katherine Heintz-Knowles was a graduate of the University of California,
Santa Barbara and did her graduate work at the University of Illinois.
And she's now a researcher mainly focused on the influences of media on
children. So it's a great pleasure to introduce Dr. Heintz-Knowles. [APPLAUSE]
|